Influential Journey’s Through Dental Communities of Practice: A Phenomenological Based Enquiry Approach
Objective: To identify meaningful factors influencing the dental professional’s transit within Communities of Practice (CoPs).
Methods: A phenomenological methodology approach was taken to conduct interviews with 7 dental elites (plus 1 pilot interview) identified through purposive sampling; all had held central positions of influence within dental CoPs; all had journeyed to those positions from the periphery of the Community of Practice (CoP). A semi-structured phenomenological based interview schedule was utilised for data collection and thematic analysis was employed for data analysis.
Results:Coding led to the identification of four progressive and interlinked emergent themes related to the meanings that the individual participants placed on their journeys undertaken from peripheral participation to the centre: Self Awareness; Social Awareness; Cultural Awareness and Transformatory Awareness.Conclusion: The journeys undertaken by individuals navigating their own trajectory within a dental CoP require a significant undertaking of awareness development across a
number of significant areas. Successful negotiation of those sites requires a preparedness for growth, adaption and evolution.
The implications for practice and suggestions for other research are included.
Billet, S. (1996) “Situated Learning: bridging socio-cultural and cognitive theorising”, Learning and Instruction. Vol 6 No 3 pp. 263-80.
Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991) “Organisational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation”, Organisational Science, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 40-57.
Campbell. M., Verenikina, I. And Herrington, A. (2009) “Intersection of trajectories: a newcomer in a community of practice”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol 21, No 8, pp.647-657.
Daniel, H. (2005) An introduction to Vygotski. 2nd Edn. London: Routledge.
Day, J. (2006) Expending nursing and health care practice: Interprofessional working. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and experience in the area of the computer. Oxford, Blackwell.
Dwyer, S. and Buckle, J. (2009) The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Vol 8 (1), pp. 54-63. http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ijq Accessed Dec 2009.
Eraut, M. (1994)Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., Hodkinson,P. and Unwin,L. (2005) “Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning” British Educational Research Journal. Vol 3, No1, pp.49-68.
Gubman, E. (2004) “From engagement to passion for work: the search for the missing person”, Human Resource Planning, Sept 2004 v27, i3, p.42. http://infotrac.galegroup.com.chain.kent.ac.uk/itw/infomark/966/10/60482074w16/purl=rc1_GBFM_0_A123120294&dyn=4!ar_fmt?sw_aep=uokent Accessed Sep 2009
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. And Clark, T. (2006) “Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense
of learning through participation, identity and practice”, Journal of Management Studies, 43:3 May, pp.641-653.
Hertzberg, F. (2008) One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees. New York: Harvard Business School Press.
Hodkinson, P. and Hodkinson, H. (2004) “Rethinking communities of practice: a case study of school teachers ’workplace learning”, International Journal of Training and Development. Vol 8; No 1, pp21-31. http://www.tlrp.org/project%20sites/iilw/pr5%20h-tampere,paper%20141.htm Accessed Sep 2009.
Hogg, M., Terry, D. and White, K. (1995) “A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory”, Social Psychology Quarterly. Vol 58, No 4, pp255-269.
Hughes, J., Jewson, N. and Unwin, L. (2007) Communities of practice: critical perspectives. Oxford: Routledge.
Kahn, W. (1990) “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work”, Academy of Management Journal1990. Vol. 33, No. 4, Pp.692-724. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=3&hid=104&sid=3d6eaa3d-9f9c-41ba-8c9c-3271b3d8d9e1%40sessionmgr113 Accessed Sep 2009.
Lantolf, J. (2000) Introducing sociocultural theory: sociocultural theory and second langue learning. Oxford, Oxford Press.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Le May, A. (ed.) (2009) Communities of practice in health and social care. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Moustakas, C. (1994) Phenomenological Research Methods. London: Sage.
Nonaka, I. (1994) “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organisation Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, February, pp.14-36.
Overell, S. (2008) “Inwardness: The rise of meaningful work”, The Work Foundation. Provocation Series Volume 4 Number 2, The Work Foundation: London. http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/32_inwardness_final.pdf
Accessed Feb 2010.
Pemberton, J., Mavin, S. and Stalker, B. (2007) “Scratching beneath the communities of (mal) practice, the learning organisation”, The International Journal of Knowledge and Organisational Learning Management, Vol. 14, No 1 pp.62-73.
Accessed 2 Feb 10.
Pratt, M., Rockmann,K. and Kaufmann,J.(2006) “Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 29, No 2, pp.235-262.
Roberts, J. (2006) “Limits to communities of practice”, Journal of management studies. Vol 43. No3. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.623-639.
Rogoff, B. (1994) “Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners”, Mind, Culture and Activity, Vol 1, Issue 4, pp.209-229.
Smith, A., Flowers, P. and Larkin, M. (2009) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, methods and research. London: Sage.
Spinelli, E. (1989) The interpreted world: an introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage.
Stahl. G.(2000) A model of collaborative knowledge building: in Fishman and Oconnar-Divelbiss (ed) proceedings of the Fourth International.
Turner, J. Brown, R, and Tajfel, H. (1979) “Social comparisons and group interest in in group favouritism”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 9, issue 2. pp.187-204.
Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by Cole, John-Steiner, Scribner, Souberman. London: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: University Press.
© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
AJPP requests that, as the creator(s)/author(s) of the manuscript you are submitting, that you assign certain rights to the manuscript to the AJPP in exchange for undertaking to publish the article in electronic form and, in general, to pursue its dissemination throughout the world. The rights the AJPP requests are:
- The right to publish the article in electronic form or in any other form it may choose that is in keeping with its role as a scholarly journal with the goal of disseminating the work as widely as possible;
- The right to be the sole publisher of the article for a period of 12 months;
- The right to make the article available to the public within a period of not more than 24 months, as determined by relevant journal staff of the AJPP;
- The right to grant republication rights to itself or others in print, electronic, or any other form, with any revenues accrued to be shared equally between the author(s) and the journal;
- The right to administer permission to use portions of the article as requested by others, seeking recompense when the AJPP sees it as warranted;
- The right to seek or take advantage of opportunities to have the article included in a database aimed at increasing awareness of it;
- As the author(s), the AJPP wishes you to retain the right to republish the article, with acknowledgement of the AJPP as the original publisher, in whole or in part, in any other pbulication of your own, including any anthology that you might edit with up to three others;
- As the author(s), the AJPP wishes you to retain the right to place the article on your personal Web page or that of your university or institution. The AJPP askes that you include this notice: A fully edited, peer-reviewed version of this article was first published by the Advanced Journal of Professional Practice, <Year>, <Volume>, <Issue>, <Page Numbers>.
- You retain the right to unrestricted use of your paper for yourself or for your own teaching purposes.
BY AGREEING TO THE FOREGOING, YOU CONFIRM THAT THE MANUSCRIPT YOU ARE SUBMITTING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, AND THAT NO AGREEMENT TO PUBLISH IS OUTSTANDING.
SHOULD THE ARTICLE CONTAIN MATERIAL WHICH REQUIRES WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR INCLUSION, YOU AGREE THAT IT IS YOUR OBLIGATION IN LAW TO IDENTIFY SUCH MATERIAL TO THE EDITOR OF THE AJPP AND TO OBTAIN SUCH PERMISSION. THE AJPP WILL NOT PAY ANY PERMISSION FEES. SHOULD THE AJPP BE OF THE OPINION THAT SUCH PERMISSION IS NECESSARY, IT WILL REQUIRE YOU TO PURSUE SUCH PERMISSSION PRIOR TO PUBLICATION.
AS AUTHOR(S), YOU WARRANT THAT THE ARTICLE BEING SUBMITTED IS ORIGINAL TO YOU.
Provided the foregoing terms are satisfactory, and that you are in agreement with them, please indicate your acceptance by checking the appropriate box and proceed with your submission.