Professional Closure: An Example from American Clinical Psychology

  • Matthew Merced
Keywords: closure, clinical psychology, professional psychology, practitioner-scholar, doctor of psychology

Abstract

Objective: Study the American clinical psychology landscape to discern scientist-practitioner and practitioner-scholar involvement in professional activities, specifically the organizational and scholarly domains.

Methods: Data were gathered from online sources regarding: professional association membership, leadership, and award recipients; faculty positions within psychology doctoral programs; journal editor positions; and contributions to the scholarly literature.

Results: Scientist-practitioners dominate American clinical psychology’s principal professional association’s membership (73.5%) and leadership (93.2%) and receive nearly all its awards (98.2%).  Faculties for both practitioner-scholar programs (76.2%) and scientist-practitioner programs (99.1%) were dominated by scientist-practitioners.  The editor of each journal surveyed was a scientist-practitioner.  Most literature contributions (77.3%) were from scientist-practitioners.

Conclusions: Scientist-practitioners in the United States can access organizational and scholarly roles/activities.  Practitioner-scholars do not have the same access.  Scientist-practitioners use implicit, normalized practices known as ‘closure methods’ to preserve their access to professional opportunities, resources, and rewards.  Practitioner-scholars, subject to ‘professional closure’, compose an excluded group.

References

Acker, J. (2006) ‘Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class and Race in Organizations’. Gender & Society, 20, 441–64

American Psychological Association. (2013). Guidelines and Principles for the Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology. Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychological Association. (2016a). ‘Accredited Programs in Clinical Psychology’. http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/programs/clinical.aspx

(Accessed 4 November 2016).

American Psychological Association (2016b). ‘APA Member Profiles’.

http://www.apa.org/workforce/publications/15-member/index.aspx?tab=2

(Accessed 4 November 2016).

American Psychological Association (2016c). ‘Governance’.

http://www.apa.org/about/governance/index.aspx (Accessed 4

November 2016).

American Psychological Association. (2016d). ‘Grants, Awards, and Funding’. http://www.apa.org/about/awards/ (Accessed 4 November 2016).

American Psychological Association. (2016e). ‘Practice Organization Governance’.

http://www.apapracticecentral.org/about/governance.aspx (Accessed 4

November 2016).

Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2016). 2016 Psychology Licensing Exam Scores by Program. Peachtree, GA: Author.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Revisited: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Chrobot-Mason, D., & Aramovich, N. P. (2013). ‘The Psychological Benefits of Creating an Affirming Climate for Workplace Diversity’. Group & Organization Management, 38, 659-689.

Clark, R. A., Harden, S. I., & Johnson, W. B. (2000). ‘Mentor Relationships in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Training: Results of a National Survey’. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 262-268.

Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). ‘Seeing is Believing: Exposure to Counter Stereotypic Women Leaders and its Effect on the Malleability of Automatic Gender Stereotyping’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658.

Elman, N. S., Illfelder-Kaye, J., & Robiner, W. N. (2005). ‘Professional Development: Training for Professionalism as a Foundation for Competent Practice in Psychology’. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 367–375.

Fagenson, E. A. (1989). ‘The Mentor Advantage: Perceived Career/Job Experiences of Protégés versus nonprotégés’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309-320.

Forehand, R. L. (2008). ‘The Art and Science of Mentoring in Psychology: A Necessary Practice to Ensure our Future’. American Psychologist, 63, 744–755.

Halpern, D. E., Smothergill, D. W., Allen, M., Baker, S., Baum, C., Best, D., . . . Weaver, K. A. (1998). ‘Scholarship in Psychology: A Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century’. American Psychologist, 53, 1292–1297.

Haynes, S. N., Lemsky, C., & Sexton-Radek, K. (1987). ‘Why Clinicians Infrequently Do Research’. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 515-519.

Hoshmand, L. T., & Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). ‘Redefining the Science-Practice Relationship and Professional Training’. American Psychologist, 47, 55-66.

Korman, M. (Ed.). (1976). Levels and Patterns of Professional Training in Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

Larkin, G. (1983). Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine. London: Tavistock.

Mader, E. M., Rodriguez, J. E., Campbell, K. M., Smilnak, T., bazemore, A. W., Petterson, S., & Morley, C. P. (2016). ‘Status of Underrepresented Minority and Female Faculty at Medical Schools Located within Historically Black Colleges and in Puerto Rico’. Medical Education Online, 21.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29535 (Accessed 25 February 2017)

Mangione, L., Borden, K. A., Nadkarni, L., Evarts, K., & Hyde, K. (2018). ‘Mentoring in Clinical Psychology Programs: Broadening and Deepening’. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12, 4-13.

Mann, S. T., & Merced, M. (2018). ‘Preparing for Entry-Level Practice in Supervision’. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49, 98-106.

Merced, M., Stutman, Z. E., & Mann, S. T. (2015). ‘A Developmental Lag in the Evolution of Doctor of Psychology Programs’. Training and Education in

Professional Psychology,9, 248-257.

Merced, M., Stutman, Z. E., & Mann, S. T. (2017). ‘Teaching the History of Psychology: A Content Analysis of Course Syllabi from Doctor of Psychology Programs’. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17, 45-60.

Murphy, R. (1988). Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. New York: Clarendon Press.

Norcross, J. C., Kohout, J. L., & Wicherski, M. (2005). ‘Graduate Study in Psychology: 1971–2004’. American Psychologist, 60, 959–975.

Peterson, R. L., Peterson, D. R., Abrams, J. C., & Stricker, G. (1997). ‘The National Council of Schools and Programs of Professional Psychology Educational Model’. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 373-386.

Raimy, V. C. (Ed.). (1950). Training in Clinical Psychology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

Russell, J. E. A., & Adams, D. M. (1997). ‘The Changing Nature of Mentoring in Organizations: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Mentoring in

Organizations’. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 1–14.

Scott, D., Brown, A., Lunt, I., & Thorne, L. (2004). Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Schneider, B., Gunnarson, S. K., & Niles-Jolly, K. (1994). ‘Creating the Climate and Culture of Success’. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 17-29.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). ‘Signature Pedagogies in the Professions’. Daedalus, Summer, 52-59.

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C., Buesche, A. C., & Garabedian, K. (2006). ‘Reclaiming Education’s Doctorates: A Critique and a Proposal’. Educational Researcher, 35, 25-32.

Spence, M. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Steele, C. M. (1997). ‘A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance’. American Psychologist, 6, 613-629.

Vespia, K. (2006). ‘Integrating Professional Identities: Counselling Psychologist, Scientist-Practitioner and Undergraduate Educator’. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 265–280.

Weber, M. (1921/1978). Economy and Society. G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Original work published in 1921

Published
2019-10-09
How to Cite
Merced, M. (2019). Professional Closure: An Example from American Clinical Psychology. Advanced Journal of Professional Practice, 2(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/03/ajpp.611
Section
Articles