Is there Gender Bias in Medical Resources used in Undergraduate Medical Education? A Content Analysis Using the Gender Bias 14 (GB14) Measurement Tool.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/03/ajpp.1310Resumen
Background: Medicine has been conceived as a male led career for centuries, with 58% of higher trainee jobs in the national health service being occupied by men. Male gender biases and discrimination against women in Medicine have been found to contribute to women choosing certain specialties, such as General Practice rather than surgery. This is likely attributable to healthcare professional cultures, equipment and resources, as well as a lack of female role models in e.g., general surgery. What is not apparent from the literature is whether a gender bias exists at undergraduate level, especially within teaching resources, which may also be contributing to future career choices made by women in medicine.
Methods: This study was a content analysis of a selection of core medical education resources including 3 chapters of a single medical textbook and all year 1 reading lists. Using the GB14(c) genderness tool, these resources were quantitively measured for extent of gender bias within. The GB14(c) measures bias on a sliding scale, with male bias represented by a plus score (+) and female bias represented by a minus (-) score, therefore results are given as + or - respectively with both indicating gender bias in one direction or the other. The GB14© gives an overall outcome of low, moderate, high or extremely high bias, depending on the score.
Results: Results highlighted an overall moderate level male bias across the 3 chapters of the core medical textbook. The authors of the chapters within this book were also moderately male biased (+23). Chapter by chapter, there was male bias in all but reproduction as follows: Cardiovascular System = +37; Respiratory System = +26; Reproductive System = -193.
The six year-1 module reading lists proved to be highly male biased with 267/305(88%) authors being male. % male authors per module were: FHD module 46/56(82%); HLB 42/47(89%); NME 33/36(91%); NB 61/67(92%); RE 54/59(91%); and MIS 35/45(77%).
Conclusions: There are male gender biases within medical education core teaching materials which may have impacts on female medical students, who aren’t then exposed to female role models or female representation overall. This may impact women’s future career aspirations by leading women into specialities they are more represented in, such as family medicine or obstetrics, gynaecology, and reproductive medicine. This is likely attributable to historical dominance of men in medicine and science with a predominance of males writing these textbooks therefore leading to a general lack of available resources which are gender balanced. Recommendations are for medical schools to include a wider pool of gender balanced resources where possible, but for the medicine and STEM community to encourage more publications from women.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
AJPP requests that, as the creator(s)/author(s) of the manuscript you are submitting, that you assign certain rights to the manuscript to the AJPP in exchange for undertaking to publish the article in electronic form and, in general, to pursue its dissemination throughout the world. The rights the AJPP requests are:
- The right to publish the article in electronic form or in any other form it may choose that is in keeping with its role as a scholarly journal with the goal of disseminating the work as widely as possible;
- The right to be the sole publisher of the article for a period of 12 months;
- The right to make the article available to the public within a period of not more than 24 months, as determined by relevant journal staff of the AJPP;
- The right to grant republication rights to itself or others in print, electronic, or any other form, with any revenues accrued to be shared equally between the author(s) and the journal;
- The right to administer permission to use portions of the article as requested by others, seeking recompense when the AJPP sees it as warranted;
- The right to seek or take advantage of opportunities to have the article included in a database aimed at increasing awareness of it;
- As the author(s), the AJPP wishes you to retain the right to republish the article, with acknowledgement of the AJPP as the original publisher, in whole or in part, in any other pbulication of your own, including any anthology that you might edit with up to three others;
- As the author(s), the AJPP wishes you to retain the right to place the article on your personal Web page or respository of your university or institution. The AJPP askes that you include this notice: A fully edited, peer-reviewed version of this article was first published by the Advanced Journal of Professional Practice, <Year>, <Volume>, <Issue>, <Page Numbers>.
- You retain the right to unrestricted use of your paper for yourself or for your own teaching purposes.
BY AGREEING TO THE FOREGOING, YOU CONFIRM THAT THE MANUSCRIPT YOU ARE SUBMITTING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, AND THAT NO AGREEMENT TO PUBLISH IS OUTSTANDING.
SHOULD THE ARTICLE CONTAIN MATERIAL WHICH REQUIRES WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR INCLUSION, YOU AGREE THAT IT IS YOUR OBLIGATION IN LAW TO IDENTIFY SUCH MATERIAL TO THE EDITOR OF THE AJPP AND TO OBTAIN SUCH PERMISSION. THE AJPP WILL NOT PAY ANY PERMISSION FEES. SHOULD THE AJPP BE OF THE OPINION THAT SUCH PERMISSION IS NECESSARY, IT WILL REQUIRE YOU TO PURSUE SUCH PERMISSSION PRIOR TO PUBLICATION.
AS AUTHOR(S), YOU WARRANT THAT THE ARTICLE BEING SUBMITTED IS ORIGINAL TO YOU.
Provided the foregoing terms are satisfactory, and that you are in agreement with them, please indicate your acceptance by checking the appropriate box and proceed with your submission.
